| Title |
Sex-specific influence on cardiac structural remodeling and therapy in cardiovascular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Sex Differences, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13293-019-0223-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elise L. Kessler, Mathilde R. Rivaud, Marc A. Vos, Toon A. B. van Veen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 43% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 18% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,837,290
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Sex Differences
#119
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,799
of 449,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Sex Differences
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.