| Title |
What should be the preferred exercise modality for overweight and obese individuals? Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-0964-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lene Aasdahl, Vegard Moe Iversen, Eva Skovlund, Dagfinn Aune, Marius Steiro Fimland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Peru | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,297,395
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#409
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,342
of 438,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#25
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.