You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing the Expert Based Weights Used in the UK’s Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Against Three Preference-Based Methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Indicators Research, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11205-018-02054-z |
| Authors |
Verity Watson, Chris Dibben, Matt Cox, Iain Atherton, Matt Sutton, Mandy Ryan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 75% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,975,895
of 23,989,841 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#362
of 1,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,306
of 444,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.