| Title |
Clinical significance of cystoscopic urethral stricture recurrence after anterior urethroplasty: a multi-institution analysis from Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-019-02653-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nima Baradaran, Kirkpatrick B. Fergus, Rachel A. Moses, Darshan P. Patel, Thomas W. Gaither, Bryan B. Voelzke, Thomas G. Smith, Bradley A. Erickson, Sean P. Elliott, Nejd F. Alsikafi, Alex J. Vanni, Jill Buckley, Lee C. Zhao, Jeremy B. Myers, Benjamin N. Breyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 67% |
| Germany | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 68% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,752,994
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#332
of 2,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,817
of 439,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#17
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.