↓ Skip to main content

How bothersome double-J ureteral stents are after semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy: a prospective single-institution observational study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
How bothersome double-J ureteral stents are after semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy: a prospective single-institution observational study
Published in
World Journal of Urology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00345-018-2376-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Bosio, Eugenio Alessandria, Ettore Dalmasso, Dario Peretti, Simone Agosti, Alessandro Bisconti, Paolo Destefanis, Roberto Passera, Paolo Gontero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 19 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,965,813
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#761
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,397
of 328,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#29
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.