↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Methods for Healthcare Regulation: Rating, Screening and Surveillance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Methods for Healthcare Regulation: Rating, Screening and Surveillance
Published in
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2011.01010.x
Authors

David Spiegelhalter, Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson, Martin Bardsley, Ian Blunt, Christopher Wood, Olivia Grigg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 7%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Other 12 10%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Mathematics 25 20%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Engineering 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 6%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,356,994
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)
#85
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,188
of 246,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them