| Title |
Physiological responses of the calcifying rhodophyte, Corallina officinalis (L.), to future CO2 levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-011-1854-9 |
| Authors |
Laurie C. Hofmann, Gamze Yildiz, Dieter Hanelt, Kai Bischof |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 25% |
| Researcher | 40 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,610,300
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#894
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,944
of 242,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.