Title |
Combining MCMC with ‘sequential’ PKPD modelling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10928-008-9109-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Lunn, Nicky Best, David Spiegelhalter, Gordon Graham, Beat Neuenschwander |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 39% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 11 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,744,632
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#93
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,332
of 183,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them