| Title |
Impact of levosimendan on weaning from peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in intensive care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0503-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shamir Vally, Cyril Ferdynus, Romain Persichini, Bruno Bouchet, Eric Braunberger, Hugo Lo Pinto, Olivier Martinet, David Vandroux, Thomas Aujoulat, Jérôme Allyn, Nicolas Allou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Romania | 3 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 52% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,441,049
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#317
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,833
of 452,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.