↓ Skip to main content

Late Pleistocene Mammals of the Northwestern Altai: Report 2. Charysh Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Paleontological Journal, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Late Pleistocene Mammals of the Northwestern Altai: Report 2. Charysh Basin
Published in
Paleontological Journal, February 2019
DOI 10.1134/s0031030118120055
Authors

A. K. Agadjanian, M. V. Shunkov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,584,555
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#140
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,369
of 438,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.