↓ Skip to main content

Nature and Nurturing: Parenting in the Context of Child Temperament

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
452 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
579 Mendeley
Title
Nature and Nurturing: Parenting in the Context of Child Temperament
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10567-011-0093-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara J. Kiff, Liliana J. Lengua, Maureen Zalewski

Abstract

Accounting for both bidirectional and interactive effects between parenting and child temperament can fine-tune theoretical models of the role of parenting and temperament in children's development of adjustment problems. Evidence for bidirectional and interactive effects between parenting and children's characteristics of frustration, fear, self-regulation, and impulsivity was reviewed, and an overall model of children's individual differences in response to parenting is proposed. In general, children high in frustration, impulsivity and low in effortful control are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of negative parenting, while in turn, many negative parenting behaviors predict increases in these characteristics. Frustration, fearfulness, and effortful control also appear to elicit parenting behaviors that can predict increases in these characteristics. Irritability renders children more susceptible to negative parenting behaviors. Fearfulness operates in a very complex manner, sometimes increasing children's responses to parenting behaviors and sometimes mitigating them and apparently operating differently across gender. Important directions for future research include the use of study designs and analytic approaches that account for the direction of effects and for developmental changes in parenting and temperament over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 579 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 573 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 20%
Student > Master 94 16%
Student > Bachelor 72 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 9%
Researcher 50 9%
Other 65 11%
Unknown 126 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 296 51%
Social Sciences 60 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 1%
Neuroscience 7 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 151 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,780,145
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#75
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,198
of 121,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.