| Title |
Applicability of in vivo staging of regional amyloid burden in a cognitively normal cohort with subjective memory complaints: the INSIGHT-preAD study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13195-019-0466-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fatemah A. Sakr, Michel J. Grothe, Enrica Cavedo, Irina Jelistratova, Marie-Odile Habert, Martin Dyrba, Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla, Hugo Bertin, Maxime Locatelli, Stephane Lehericy, Stefan Teipel, Bruno Dubois, Harald Hampel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 13 | 15% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,703,194
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#279
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,120
of 448,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.