↓ Skip to main content

Letter to Editor: Routine Pathology and Postoperative Follow‐Up are Not Cost‐Effective in Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Letter to Editor: Routine Pathology and Postoperative Follow‐Up are Not Cost‐Effective in Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00268-019-04919-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pankaj Kumar Garg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,560,927
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,074
of 4,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,526
of 437,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#46
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.