| Title |
Predicting suitable environments and potential occurrences for coelacanths (Latimeria spp.)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-011-0202-1 |
| Authors |
Hannah L. Owens, Andrew C. Bentley, A. Townsend Peterson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,385,880
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#524
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,801
of 251,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.