| Title |
Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: a standardized approach to invasive species costing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-010-9807-7 |
| Authors |
Matthew P. J. Oreska, David C. Aldridge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 52 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,370
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,614
of 108,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.