↓ Skip to main content

Adverse events and nocebo phenomena: treatment or disease specific?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Adverse events and nocebo phenomena: treatment or disease specific?
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1272-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Zis, Panagiota Sykioti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Other 3 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,667,638
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,247
of 3,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,644
of 437,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#62
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.