| Title |
Implementation and acceptability of a heart attack quality improvement intervention in India: a mixed methods analysis of the ACS QUIK trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0857-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kavita Singh, Raji Devarajan, Padinhare P. Mohanan, Abigail S. Baldridge, Dimple Kondal, David E. Victorson, Kunal N. Karmali, Lihui Zhao, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Shifalika Goenka, Mark D. Huffman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,111,683
of 24,337,175 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,283
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,919
of 445,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#29
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,337,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.