↓ Skip to main content

A spatio temporal spectral framework for plant stress phenotyping

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
A spatio temporal spectral framework for plant stress phenotyping
Published in
Plant Methods, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0398-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raghav Khanna, Lukas Schmid, Achim Walter, Juan Nieto, Roland Siegwart, Frank Liebisch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Lecturer 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 33%
Engineering 12 10%
Computer Science 11 9%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,094,131
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#349
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,316
of 437,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.