| Title |
UltraNurse: teaching point-of-care ultrasound to intensive care nurses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-05512-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Morreale Tulleken, Harry Gelissen, Erik Lust, Thomas Smits, Toon van Galen, Armand R. J. Girbes, Pieter Roel Tuinman, Paul W. G. Elbers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,303,296
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,659
of 5,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,063
of 438,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#45
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.