You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coffee, Decaffeinated Coffee, and Tea Consumption in Relation to Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.439 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Huxley, Crystal Man Ying Lee, Federica Barzi, Leif Timmermeister, Sebastien Czernichow, Vlado Perkovic, Diederick E. Grobbee, David Batty, Mark Woodward |
| Abstract |
Coffee consumption has been reported to be inversely associated with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Similar associations have also been reported for decaffeinated coffee and tea. We report herein the findings of meta-analyses for the association between coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and tea consumption with risk of diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 91% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 18% |
| Unknown | 78 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 470. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#58,458
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#465
of 11,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115
of 175,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.