| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of antidepressants versus active monitoring for mild-to-moderate major depressive disorder: a multisite non-randomized-controlled trial in primary care (INFAP study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10198-019-01034-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Rubio-Valera, María Teresa Peñarrubia-María, Maria Iglesias-González, Martin Knapp, Paul McCrone, Marta Roig, Ramón Sabes-Figuera, Juan V. Luciano, Juan M. Mendive, Ana Gabriela Murrugara-Centurión, Jordi Alonso, Antoni Serrano-Blanco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#893
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,046
of 446,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.