↓ Skip to main content

Wine Authenticity by Quantitative 1H NMR Versus Multitechnique Analysis: a Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Food Analytical Methods, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 583)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Wine Authenticity by Quantitative 1H NMR Versus Multitechnique Analysis: a Case Study
Published in
Food Analytical Methods, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12161-018-01425-z
Authors

Louis Gougeon, Gregory da Costa, Tristan Richard, François Guyon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Chemistry 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,068,477
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#49
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,906
of 470,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.