↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
797 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
504 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), March 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Sardanelli, Carla Boetes, Bettina Borisch, Thomas Decker, Massimo Federico, Fiona J. Gilbert, Thomas Helbich, Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner, Werner A. Kaiser, Michael J. Kerin, Robert E. Mansel, Lorenza Marotti, Laura Martincich, Louis Mauriac, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Roberto Orecchia, Pietro Panizza, Antonio Ponti, Arnie D. Purushotham, Peter Regitnig, Marco Rosselli Del Turco, Fabienne Thibault, Robin Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 494 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 10%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Student > Postgraduate 46 9%
Student > Master 41 8%
Other 109 22%
Unknown 134 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 240 48%
Engineering 27 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 156 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#2,981
of 7,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,644
of 104,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.