Title |
Human experience with an endoluminal, endoscopic, gastrojejunal bypass sleeve
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-011-1665-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bryan J. Sandler, Roberto Rumbaut, C. Paul Swain, Gustavo Torres, Luis Morales, Lizcelly Gonzales, Sarah Schultz, Mark Talamini, Santiago Horgan |
Abstract |
This report describes the authors' experience with a unique endoluminal, endoscopically delivered and retrieved gastroduodenojejunal bypass sleeve, including short-term weight loss and changes in comorbidities. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
Researcher | 18 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,679
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,860
of 108,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.