| Title |
A bilateral gynandromorph of Nephrops norvegicus (Decapoda: Nephropidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, August 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00401394 |
| Authors |
A. S. Farmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 35% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 82% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,249,329
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#659
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287
of 3,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them