| Title |
An example of ecological traps for bats in the urban environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-019-1252-z |
| Authors |
Anton Vlaschenko, Viktor Kovalov, Vitalii Hukov, Kseniia Kravchenko, Olena Rodenko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| Spain | 7 | 10% |
| Finland | 3 | 4% |
| Poland | 3 | 4% |
| Gibraltar | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 70% |
| Scientists | 15 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,000,058
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#39
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,574
of 449,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.