Title |
Colorimetric detection and typing of E. coli lipopolysaccharides based on a dual aptamer-functionalized gold nanoparticle probe
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microchimica Acta, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00604-018-3212-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Longjiao Zhu, Shuting Li, Xiangli Shao, Yuxiang Feng, Peiyan Xie, Yunbo Luo, Kunlun Huang, Wentao Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,313,418
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#179
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,327
of 437,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.