↓ Skip to main content

Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11948-019-00086-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Harlow, Nadir Weibel, Rasheed Al Kotob, Vincent Chan, Cinnamon Bloss, Rubi Linares-Orozco, Michelle Takemoto, Camille Nebeker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Computer Science 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 26 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,959,854
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#293
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,443
of 443,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.