| Title |
The biology and ecology of the ocean sunfish Mola mola: a review of current knowledge and future research perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-009-9155-9 |
| Authors |
Edward C. Pope, Graeme C. Hays, Tierney M. Thys, Thomas K. Doyle, David W. Sims, Nuno Queiroz, Victoria J. Hobson, Lukas Kubicek, Jonathan D. R. Houghton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 227 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,074,224
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#255
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,357
of 173,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them