| Title |
Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, November 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00411-004-0258-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Bennett, Mark P. Little, Sylvia Richardson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Psychology | 4 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2011.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#131
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,307
of 144,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.