| Title |
Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery to the Back of the Eye Using Hollow Microneedles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-010-0271-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samirkumar R. Patel, Angela S. P. Lin, Henry F. Edelhauser, Mark R. Prausnitz |
| Abstract |
In this work, we tested the hypothesis that microneedles provide a minimally invasive method to inject particles into the suprachoroidal space for drug delivery to the back of the eye. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 227 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 24% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 50 | 21% |
| Engineering | 31 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,474,359
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#41
of 3,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,816
of 108,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.