↓ Skip to main content

Role of ‘dusting and pop-dusting’ using a high-powered (100 W) laser machine in the treatment of large stones (≥ 15 mm): prospective outcomes over 16 months

Overview of attention for article published in Urolithiasis, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Role of ‘dusting and pop-dusting’ using a high-powered (100 W) laser machine in the treatment of large stones (≥ 15 mm): prospective outcomes over 16 months
Published in
Urolithiasis, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00240-018-1076-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia Pietropaolo, Patrick Jones, Lily Whitehurst, Bhaskar K. Somani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,560,927
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Urolithiasis
#211
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,357
of 333,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urolithiasis
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.