↓ Skip to main content

Mid-term follow-up of stenting in chronic mesenteric ischaemia: a review of six cases

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Journal of Medical Science, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Mid-term follow-up of stenting in chronic mesenteric ischaemia: a review of six cases
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11845-013-0987-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Sharkawi, H. E. Alfadhel, M. D. Burns, M. Given, M. J. Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#19,750,862
of 24,272,486 outputs
Outputs from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#1,062
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,765
of 175,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,272,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.