You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device Sizing Based on Conventional 2D Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: An Agreement Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a5973 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J.M. Ospel, G. Gascou, V. Costalat, L. Piergallini, K.A. Blackham, D.W. Zumofen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 5 | 42% |
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,038,695
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#957
of 4,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,657
of 437,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#27
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.