↓ Skip to main content

The intrinsic innervation of the lung is derived from neural crest cells as shown by optical projection tomography in Wnt1‐Cre;YFP reporter mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anatomy, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The intrinsic innervation of the lung is derived from neural crest cells as shown by optical projection tomography in Wnt1‐Cre;YFP reporter mice
Published in
Journal of Anatomy, September 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01295.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy J. Freem, Sophie Escot, David Tannahill, Noah R. Druckenbrod, Nikhil Thapar, Alan J. Burns

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#19,425,325
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#1,899
of 2,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,933
of 100,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.