| Title |
Do Physician Organizations Located in Lower Socioeconomic Status Areas Score Lower on Pay-for-Performance Measures?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1946-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alyna T. Chien, Kristen Wroblewski, Cheryl Damberg, Thomas R. Williams, Dolores Yanagihara, Yelena Yakunina, Lawrence P. Casalino |
| Abstract |
Physician organizations (POs)--independent practice associations and medical groups--located in lower socioeconomic status (SES) areas may score poorly in pay-for-performance (P4P) programs. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,124
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,061
of 248,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.