| Title |
The impact of intergenerational programs on social capital in Japan: a randomized population-based cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6480-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoh Murayama, Hiroshi Murayama, Masami Hasebe, Jun Yamaguchi, Yoshinori Fujiwara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Psychology | 13 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,168,183
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,510
of 16,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,879
of 450,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#60
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.