| Title |
Why we should let rewilding be wild and biodiverse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01707-w |
| Authors |
Luísa Genes, Jens-Christian Svenning, Alexandra S. Pires, Fernando A. S. Fernandez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 14% |
| Denmark | 2 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,161,587
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#301
of 2,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,409
of 447,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.