↓ Skip to main content

Designing faculty development: lessons learnt from a qualitative interpretivist study exploring students’ expectations and experiences of clinical teaching

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Designing faculty development: lessons learnt from a qualitative interpretivist study exploring students’ expectations and experiences of clinical teaching
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1480-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Blitz, Marietjie de Villiers, Susan van Schalkwyk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Lecturer 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 29%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 52 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,344,752
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#361
of 3,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,376
of 448,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#12
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.