↓ Skip to main content

Highlights of the 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian Musculoskeletal Imaging Group [AMSIG] 2018, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Highlights of the 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian Musculoskeletal Imaging Group [AMSIG] 2018, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00256-018-3082-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Shulman, Timothy Dickson, Gregory Cowderoy, Philip Lucas, Morgan McMeniman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Chemistry 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,560,927
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#952
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,419
of 346,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#52
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.