| Title |
Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0411-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colene Bentley, Stuart Peacock, Julia Abelson, Michael M. Burgess, Olivier Demers-Payette, Holly Longstaff, Laura Tripp, John N. Lavis, Michael G. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 21 | 53% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
| Scientists | 12 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,389,485
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#135
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,485
of 448,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.