| Title |
The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department: a multi-centre derivation and validation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2329-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kordo Saeed, Darius Cameron Wilson, Frank Bloos, Philipp Schuetz, Yuri van der Does, Olle Melander, Pierre Hausfater, Jacopo M. Legramante, Yann-Erick Claessens, Deveendra Amin, Mari Rosenqvist, Graham White, Beat Mueller, Maarten Limper, Carlota Clemente Callejo, Antonella Brandi, Marc-Alexis Macchi, Nicholas Cortes, Alexander Kutz, Peter Patka, María Cecilia Yañez, Sergio Bernardini, Nathalie Beau, Matthew Dryden, Eric C. M. van Gorp, Marilena Minieri, Louisa Chan, Pleunie P. M. Rood, Juan Gonzalez del Castillo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 18% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 11% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 27% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#705,567
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#491
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,954
of 448,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.