↓ Skip to main content

Design and evaluation of a time adaptive multimodal virtual keyboard

Overview of attention for article published in Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Design and evaluation of a time adaptive multimodal virtual keyboard
Published in
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12193-019-00293-z
Authors

Yogesh Kumar Meena, Hubert Cecotti, KongFatt Wong-Lin, Girijesh Prasad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 23 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 12 24%
Engineering 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#16,272,032
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
#59
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,373
of 446,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.