| Title |
Modeling double strand break susceptibility to interrogate structural variation in cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-019-1635-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy J. Ballinger, Britta A. M. Bouwman, Reza Mirzazadeh, Silvano Garnerone, Nicola Crosetto, Colin A. Semple |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,001,700
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,219
of 4,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,259
of 448,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#57
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.