↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical emergence of sequence sensitivity in the songbird auditory forebrain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Hierarchical emergence of sequence sensitivity in the songbird auditory forebrain
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00359-016-1070-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoko Ono, Kazuo Okanoya, Yoshimasa Seki

Abstract

Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) generate more complex sequences in their songs than zebra finches. Because of this, we chose this species to explore the signal processing of sound sequence in the primary auditory forebrain area, field L, and in a secondary area, the caudomedial nidopallium (NCM). We simultaneously recorded activity from multiple single units in urethane-anesthetized birds. We successfully replicated the results of a previous study in awake zebra finches examining stimulus-specific habituation of NCM neurons to conspecific songs. Then, we used an oddball paradigm and compared the neural response to deviant sounds that were presented infrequently, with the response to standard sounds, which were presented frequently. In a single sound oddball task, two different song elements were assigned for the deviant and standard sounds. The response bias to deviant elements was larger in NCM than in field L. In a triplet sequence oddball task, two triplet sequences containing elements ABC and ACB were assigned as the deviant and standard. Only neurons in NCM that displayed broad-shaped spike waveforms had sensitivity to the difference in element order. Our results suggest the hierarchical processing of complex sound sequences in the songbird auditory forebrain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 7 17%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Psychology 5 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,055,640
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#224
of 1,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,663
of 412,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.