↓ Skip to main content

Transition-metal-nitride-based thin films as novel energy harvesting materials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transition-metal-nitride-based thin films as novel energy harvesting materials
Published in
Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c5tc03891j
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Eklund, Sit Kerdsongpanya, Björn Alling

Abstract

The last few years have seen a rise in the interest in early transition-metal and rare-earth nitrides, primarily based on ScN and CrN, for energy harvesting by thermoelectricity and piezoelectricity. This is because of a number of important advances, among those the discoveries of exceptionally high piezoelectric coupling coefficient in (Sc,Al)N alloys and of high thermoelectric power factors of ScN-based and CrN-based thin films. These materials also constitute well-defined model systems for investigating thermodynamics of mixing for alloying and nanostructural design for optimization of phase stability and band structure. These features have implications for and can be used for tailoring of thermoelectric and piezoelectric properties. In this highlight article, we review the ScN- and CrN-based transition-metal nitrides for thermoelectrics, and drawing parallels with piezoelectricity. We further discuss these materials as a models systems for general strategies for tailoring of thermoelectric properties by integrated theoretical-experimental approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 28%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 31 30%
Physics and Astronomy 14 13%
Engineering 13 12%
Chemistry 5 5%
Energy 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,568,405
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices
#2,701
of 8,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,000
of 401,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices
#206
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,811 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.