↓ Skip to main content

Psychophysiological approach to the Liar paradox: Jean Buridan’s virtual entailment principle put to the test

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Psychophysiological approach to the Liar paradox: Jean Buridan’s virtual entailment principle put to the test
Published in
Synthese, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02107-x
Authors

Konrad Rudnicki, Piotr Łukowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,423,894
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#782
of 2,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,437
of 447,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#21
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.