↓ Skip to main content

Focused Tortuosity Definitions Based on Expert Clinical Assessment of Corneal Subbasal NervesExpert Assessment of Corneal Nerve Tortuosity

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Focused Tortuosity Definitions Based on Expert Clinical Assessment of Corneal Subbasal NervesExpert Assessment of Corneal Nerve Tortuosity
Published in
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, August 2015
DOI 10.1167/iovs.15-17284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil Lagali, Enea Poletti, Dipika V. Patel, Charles N. J. McGhee, Pedram Hamrah, Ahmad Kheirkhah, Mitra Tavakoli, Ioannis N. Petropoulos, Rayaz A. Malik, Tor Paaske Utheim, Andrey Zhivov, Oliver Stachs, Karen Falke, Sabine Peschel, Rudolf Guthoff, Cecilia Chao, Blanka Golebiowski, Fiona Stapleton, Alfredo Ruggeri

Abstract

We examined agreement among experts in the assessment of corneal subbasal nerve tortuosity. Images of corneal subbasal nerves were obtained from investigators at seven sites (Auckland, Boston, Linköping, Manchester, Oslo, Rostock, and Sydney) using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. A set of 30 images was assembled and ordered by increasing tortuosity by 10 expert graders from the seven sites. In a first experiment, graders assessed tortuosity without a specific definition and performed grading three times, with at least 1 week between sessions. In a second experiment, graders assessed the same image set using four focused tortuosity definitions. Intersession and intergrader repeatability for the experiments were determined using the Spearman rank correlation. Expert graders without a specific tortuosity definition had high intersession (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.80), but poor intergrader (0.62) repeatability. Specific definitions improved intergrader repeatability to 0.79. In particular, tortuosity defined by frequent small-amplitude directional changes (short range tortuosity) or by infrequent large-amplitude directional changes (long range tortuosity), indicated largely independent measures and resulted in improved repeatability across the graders. A further refinement, grading only the most tortuous nerve in a given image, improved the average correlation of a given grader's ordering of images with the group average to 0.86 to 0.90. Definitions of tortuosity specifying short or long-range tortuosity and considering only the most tortuous nerve in an image improved the agreement in tortuosity grading among a group of expert observers. These definitions could improve accuracy and consistency in quantifying subbasal nerve tortuosity in clinical studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Engineering 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Materials Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 43%