↓ Skip to main content

Life with a Primary Immune Deficiency: a Systematic Synthesis of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Life with a Primary Immune Deficiency: a Systematic Synthesis of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10875-016-0241-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgan N. Similuk, Angela Wang, Michael J. Lenardo, Lori H. Erby

Abstract

The clinical immunology literature is punctuated with research on psychosocial dimensions of illness. Studies investigating the lived experiences and stated needs of patients with primary immune deficiencies and their families are essential to improving clinical management and determining the research questions that matter to patients and other stakeholders. Yet, to move the field forward, a systematic review of literature and proposed agenda is needed. A systematic review was conducted via PubMed and Scopus to include original research on psychological, social, or behavioral aspects of primary immune deficiencies published between 1999 and 2015. A Title/Abstract keyword search was conducted, 317 candidate article abstracts were manually reviewed, and forward/backward reference searches were completed. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. These illuminate the complex psychological, social, and emotional experiences of primary immune deficiency. Themes included the potential for negative psychosocial impact from disease; adaptation over time; the multi-dimensional assessments of quality of life; familial impact; the important roles of hope, developing a sense of control, social support; and addressing anxiety/depression in our patients and their families. Methodological considerations and areas for improvement are discussed. We propose the research agenda focus on study creativity and rigor, with improved engagement with existing literature and critical study design (e.g., methodology with adequate statistical power, careful variable selection, etc.). This review highlights opportunities to advance psychosocial research and bring a brighter future to clinicians, researchers, and families affected by primary immune deficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 27%
Psychology 6 15%
Chemistry 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,661,887
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#883
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,607
of 403,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.