| Title |
The development and feasibility of a randomised family-based physical activity promotion intervention: the Families Reporting Every Step to Health (FRESH) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0408-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin M. Guagliano, Helen Elizabeth Brown, Emma Coombes, Claire Hughes, Andy P. Jones, Katie L. Morton, Edward C. F. Wilson, Esther M. F. van Sluijs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 51% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Andorra | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 57% |
| Scientists | 12 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,804,254
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#72
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,133
of 453,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.